Affordable housing to be built on contested Sea Point site, says provincial government
Announcement by MEC Tertuis Simmers comes after a decade of battles
Western Cape MEC for Infrastructure Tertuis Simmers announced on Thursday that affordable housing will be built on part of the site of the former Tafelberg remedial school in Sea Point. Photos: Matthew Hirsch
- Part of the contested site of the former Tafelberg school in Sea Point will be used for affordable housing, the provincial government has said.
- Infrastructure MEC Tertuis Simmers said part of the site would be used for housing and part for social services.
- Housing activists have been calling for affordable housing on the site for nearly a decade.
The Western Cape government is to use part of the contested Tafelberg site in Sea Point for affordable housing.
During a media briefing on Thursday, MEC of Infrastructure, Tertuis Simmers, outlined plans for the site, which has been the subject of court action since 2016 when the province announced that the site of the former remedial school would be sold to Phyllis Jowell Jewish Day School. This was immediately opposed by housing activists, and the issue has been in and out of court since. In April last year, the Supreme Court of Appeal ruled that the sale was lawful. The Constitutional Court is due to hear an appeal against this ruling by housing activist organisations Ndifuna Ukwazi and Reclaim the City on 11 February.
Simmers said the provincial Social Development Department had formally requested that part of the site be used for a range of social services in the area instead of being sold.
Part of the site would be used for services and part for affordable housing, he said. He said he was confident that Constitutional Court judgment “will still enable us to utilise a portion of this site, once subdivided, for affordable housing”.
“Unlocking the development potential at the Tafelberg site for the delivery of much-needed social services and affordable housing, will result in the optimum use of this site by the government,” he said.
Simmers said that provincial government’s ability to deliver affordable housing had been “restricted due to illegal occupation, such as the orchestrated invasion of the Helen Bowden site, and funding constraints”.
In response to questions from GroundUp, Simmers said the provincial government had done market viability assessments “for our specific vision of an affordable housing programme”.
“There are certain processes which we will need to adhere to. One of them is public participation again.”
Speaking about Reclaim the City and Ndifuna Ukwazi, who spearheaded the occupation of the Helen Bowden Nurses Home and the Woodstock Hospital, and who have been calling for Tafelberg to be used for housing for more than a decade, Simmers said: “I say this with much respect for these organisations, but these organisations must always remember why they are there. They are not there to dictate to government. They had to put proposals on the table that must be sustainable.”
Western Cape MEC of Social Development, Jaco Londt, said his department intended to use the site to “broaden our social services footprint, particularly to address the shortage of residential services in the province for persons with disabilities, and older persons. The department will be putting out a call for proposal for partnerships to ensure that we’re able to assist our most vulnerable residents.”
Members of Reclaim the City held a picket in the lobby of the legislature on Thursday. They have been calling for Tafelberg to be used for affordable housing for a decade.
Meanwhile, members of Reclaim the City held a picket at the provincial legislature on Thursday.
They said they were surprised that there was an announcement two weeks before a Constitutional Court case.
Sheila Madikane, who has lived in Sea Point since 1987 and now lives in Helen Bowden Nurses’ Home, said the Tafelberg site should have been used for affordable housing long ago.
“There are people in need of homes. That’s why there are a lot of homeless people outside.”
Buhle Booi, head of political organising at Ndifuna Ukwazi, said they had been trying to engage with the Department of Infrastructure for five years.
“We know that there were feasibility studies done to show that affordable housing was possible on that site. Those studies have been ignored by the department.”
Booi said Ndifuna Ukwazi was “shocked and disappointed” that the province had chosen to announce the Tafelberg plan through the media instead of engaging with people who stand to benefit from the site.
But, he said, “we are encouraged to see that a portion will be used for affordable housing. Sea Point is unaffordable for the majority of our people.”
Meanwhile, Disha Govender, head of Ndifuna Ukwazi Law Centre, called the province’s statement “vague” and said that they still need to understand what the plan was for mixed-use affordable housing and what the social development department planned. “Truly affordable housing for the vulnerable is what we want to see,” she said.
She said they would continue to seek clarity from the Constitutional Court.
Support independent journalism
Donate using Payfast
© 2025 GroundUp. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You may republish this article, so long as you credit the authors and GroundUp, and do not change the text. Please include a link back to the original article.
We put an invisible pixel in the article so that we can count traffic to republishers. All analytics tools are solely on our servers. We do not give our logs to any third party. Logs are deleted after two weeks. We do not use any IP address identifying information except to count regional traffic. We are solely interested in counting hits, not tracking users. If you republish, please do not delete the invisible pixel.