Lottery spent over R1-million on lawyers to stop GroundUp exposing corruption
Attacks were also launched on the integrity of our reporter
- Under its previous administration, the National Lotteries Commission (NLC) spent at least R1-million on lawyers to try to stop or counter GroundUpâs reportage exposing corruption at the NLC.
- Misinformation was spread and personal attacks launched on the integrity of our reporter.
Under its previous board and administration, the National Lotteries Commission spent at least R1-million on legal advice and lawyersâ letters to try and intimidate GroundUp and stop it from publishing stories exposing rampant corruption.
The payments were part of a concerted campaign against GroundUp that included unsuccessful complaints to the Press Council and the regular issuing of defamatory media releases attacking the integrity of GroundUp and this reporter.
At one stage, lawyers acting for the NLC sent a letter saying it intended to lay a criminal complaint against GroundUp and this reporter.
The NLC also demanded that GroundUp remove 16 stories from its website, many exposing incompetence and probable corruption involving multimillion-rand Lottery-funded projects.
The payments of fees for legal actions against GroundUp were disclosed by new Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition (TIC) Parks Tau in response to written questions from Democratic Alliance MP Toby Chance.
Tau disclosed three matters involving costs totalling nearly R1.4-million, which the NLC incurred for legal advice on media stories it believed were defamatory. Although GroundUp is only named in one of the responses, all three almost certainly involved our stories.
A reliable source, who worked at the NLC at the time, said, âThe only media publication house that the old guard pursued was GroundUp.â
The payments disclosed by Tau are:
- âMedia article on GroundUpâ at a cost of R606,819;
- âNLC/Advice on defamatory publication/TimesLive includes a payment of over R376,573 (at that time TimesLive regularly published GroundUpâs Lottery stories); and
- âNLC advice on defamatory publicationâ at a cost of R395,053.
By comparison, the sum of these three amounts, just under R1.4-million, exceeds the total legal fees GroundUp has incurred since at least 2018, during which time we have been involved in considerable litigation. Not a single legal action by the NLC against GroundUp succeeded.
Lawyers letters
Malatji Khanye (formerly Malatji & Co) was the legal firm used in all three of the above matters.
The first was on 30 January 2020, when the NLC demanded an undertaking from GroundUp that it would cease publishing details of lottery grant beneficiaries, failing which it would pursue the matter in court.
The NLC had also tried to use a section of the Lotteries Act to stop GroundUp from publishing the details of non-profit organisations that received lottery funding. In the letter, Malatji quoted a regulation aimed at preventing members of the NLCâs distributing agencies, who adjudicate on funding applications, from disclosing information about grants.
In a second letter, on 1 February 2020, Malatji amplified its demand for the removal of the articles mentioning beneficiaries and claimed that it intended to lay criminal charges.
GroundUpâs attorney, Jacques Louw, responded to Malatji disputing the NLCâs interpretation of the regulations.
Three weeks later, the NLC laid a complaint with the Press Ombudsman. GroundUp opposed the complaint because it was submitted late and was the subject of pending litigation covering the same issues.
The complaint was rejected by the Public Advocate of the Press Council and this was confirmed on appeal. Malatji was not directly involved in the Ombud matter.
The second time Malatji was involved in a matter against GroundUp was in July 2020, when it represented a brand new non-profit, United Civil Society in Action (UCSA), which was trying to stop GroundUp from publishing details of lottery grantees. The NLC was named as a respondent in the matter and Malatji represented the Commission and filed answering papers. But, even though the NLC was listed as a respondent, UCSA put forward arguments similar to those the NLC had used to claim that it would be illegal for details of grants to be made public.
UCSA, headed up by Tebogo Sithathu, who was close to the NLCâs previous administration, sent a lawyerâs letter to Ebrahim Patel (then TIC minister who has been succeeded by Parks Tau) demanding that he not release details of organisations that had received Lottery grants.
Then on 6 November 2020, Malatji wrote to GroundUp on behalf of NLC Commissioner Thabang Mampane (who would later resign under a cloud). A few days earlier, GroundUp had reported how she had told Parliament that a Lottery-funded minstrel museum, which didnât exist, had been completed.
Mampane, who said that the article was defamatory and âpatently falseâ, demanded a retraction of the story and an unconditional apology. GroundUpâs lawyer responded, stating the facts about the museum, and asked Mampane to disprove them. Malatji never responded.
GroundUp reported earlier this month how Sithathu is involved in a new fightback to dislodge the current NLC board and commissioner.
Media campaign
The NLC backed up its âlawfareâ campaign with complaints to the Press Council and defamatory media statements like this one in June 2020, headlined: âGroundUp campaign against the National Lotteries Commission.â
It was in response to an editorial published by GroundUp on the same day, titled âLawfare launched against GroundUp to stop us from exposing lottery corruption.â
The editorial, based on years of stories published by GroundUp, bluntly stated: âThe National Lotteries Commission is a corrupt, captured state institution that is enabling the pillaging of poor peopleâs money.â
In its statement, the NLC made wild allegations without offering any evidence about GroundUpâs reporting. The allegations, which were similar to claims made in other media statements it had released and would continue to release, began after GroundUp started exposing corruption involving Lottery funds.
The NLC said, âThe National Lotteries Commission notes the continued false, defamatory and injurious attacks by GroundUp today. Aside from the content of this campaign being slanted and biased, it is littered with half-truths and supposition.â
In another media statement (July 2020), the NLC said it was the âsubject of a campaign of relentless vilification by online publication GroundUp and Raymond Joseph. This sensationalised campaign has harmed the NLC in its business and defamed its leadershipâ.
And, when GroundUp visited Kuruman to report on a series of lottery-funded infrastructure projects, where tens of millions of rands had been misappropriated, the NLC released a media statement calling on the public to report this reporter to its fraud line. It also asked them to report whistleblower Sello Qhina, who joined me in Kuruman.
The NLC subsequently removed our names from the copy of the media release it published on its website.
A misinformation campaign
The NLC may well have been behind or co-operated with an anonymous, defamatory graphic claiming that this reporter and people connected to him had benefited from over R51-million in lottery grants. The graphic continues to be disseminated.
All those named in it had at some time been directors of The Big Issue, a non-profit magazine. The graphic listed a series of grants to other non-profits in which they were subsequently involved. Tellingly, the graphic lists two grants as having their application for funding rejected â something only someone who had access to the NLCâs grants system could have known.
Disgraced former NLC COO Phillemon Letwaba repeated the claims in a 2021 interview on television. This reporter is now suing him for defamation.
Following the interview, DA MP Mat Cuthbert in a written parliamentary question to then TIC Minister Ebrahim Patel asked for the details of the 12 organisations Letwaba claimed were supposedly linked to this reporter.
In his reply, Patel said he had been given an answer by NLC Commissioner Mampane that âthe NLC received âa formal anonymous complaintâ relating to Mr Raymond Joseph having a direct or indirect interest in eight NLC-funded organisationsâ.
Patel said the NLC had failed to provide him with any details of the so-called links to this reporter.
Sithathu included the graphic in a letter he sent recently to Minister Tau, which included a demand that this reporter be investigated. He also reshared the graphic widely on social media but, as with the letter to Tau, supplied no evidence to back up the claims.
None of the grants mentioned have ever been flagged and no evidence of fraud or corruption involving them ever produced. Nor has this reporter, any member of his family or GroundUp ever financially benefited from any Lottery grants. But even had any of us received Lottery funding, it would not constitute a conflict of interest to report on corruption at the NLC.
Next: Helping hand offered to woman feeding children in East London
Previous: Ombud lambasts Legal Practice Council
Letters
Dear Editor
As the leader of an NPO based in the rural areas of Umtata-Tsolo in the Eastern Cape, we are deeply concerned about the ongoing corruption reported in the news while we struggle to make progress. We want the Department of Trade and Industry to support and empower us to do things the right way.
Our communities are stricken by poverty, with children affected by drugs, malnutrition, and many child-headed households. We are disappointed that our NPO has been denied funding by the department for minor reasons, while we hear on social media that new organisations, without financial records, are being funded. It makes us feel that without political connections, our struggles will go unheard. We urge the department to reconsider and support us in these rural areas, where poverty is evident in every aspect of our lives.
© 2024 GroundUp. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You may republish this article, so long as you credit the authors and GroundUp, and do not change the text. Please include a link back to the original article.
We put an invisible pixel in the article so that we can count traffic to republishers. All analytics tools are solely on our servers. We do not give our logs to any third party. Logs are deleted after two weeks. We do not use any IP address identifying information except to count regional traffic. We are solely interested in counting hits, not tracking users. If you republish, please do not delete the invisible pixel.